I stumbled upon a book this week,
The Way of the Master by Ray Comfort
and Kirk Cameron. They run an organisation by the same name, and another called
Living Waters. They have produced a number of almost feature length films
covering controversial topics, these can be watched on their website or on
Youtube at no cost. The most recent is called The Atheist Delusion. Both organisations are committed to biblical
evangelism.
They state that the modern
Western church has lost its way. That due to an over-emphasis on grace and the
love of God our churches are full of false converts. These people have been
told that God has a wonderful plan for their lives and that all they need to do
is to pray a prayer, sign a card or make a decision to accept Jesus and be
restored to God. The majority then continue their lives exactly as before but
now with the “saved by Jesus” or "born again" label. There was no repentance and therefore
there is no visible change in their behaviour.
When trials and suffering come to
these people, they lose interest in their faith or become angry and
disillusioned with God for their plight. They question the “wonderful plan”
they were offered and blame God for their circumstances. They then either
gradually fall into sin believing that God will forgive them later as life is
just too hard, and God is not delivering what He has promised. Or they harden
their hearts and walk away from the faith, they are thus in a worse position
than they were in in the first place. They have now rejected God
completely and are resentful and bitter towards Him if they still acknowledge
His existence.
You may be thinking that these
observations are not new, and that other well-known preachers and authors (John
MacArthur) have been highlighting “easy believism” and other mass conversion
methods for years.
Comfort, however, offers a
solution. He suggests that the only way for someone to be soundly converted is
to first confront them with the law and then outline God’s plan of salvation
through Jesus. He believes that the only way to do this is by using the Ten
Commandments to make a person realise that they are a wretched sinner before a holy God. A person needs to admit that
they are a liar, thief and adulterer at heart amongst other things. Then they
will understand that God’s wrath is upon them and will therefore desire to
escape from the penalty of their sin which is ultimately eternity in hell.
It is only once they have
acknowledged their sin that Jesus’ death is offered as the solution. The point
is that unless someone realises the danger, they are in they are not going to
take action to ensure their personal safety. Comfort uses the analogy of a
blind man walking towards the edge of a cliff. Someone comes up to him and
tweaks the MP3 player he is carrying to enhance the sound so he can enjoy his
journey. He is thrilled and merrily continues towards the cliff edge,
presumably falling to his death. This is what we are doing when we focus on
people’s immediate physical needs, comfort and wellbeing rather than their
eternal destination.
At first, I thought, wow what a
great resource and method for evangelism. I watched all the movies on the
website and looked at ordering tracts. But I was curious and decided to
research what others were saying about Comfort’s ministry—that was an eye
opener! It seems Comfort is like Marmite, you either love him or you hate him.
I expected that, to some degree,
due to the controversial issues he tackles. I would’ve been more concerned if
he didn’t have his critics. But some of the comments were coming from Christian
sources that I respected.
The main two concerns were that
the Ten Commandments were not designed to be used in this way for evangelism as
we are now living under the New Covenant. Also, that a “one size fits all” or
method approach for evangelism doesn’t allow sufficient room for the Spirit to
lead and guide a believer when witnessing. That each person is an individual and should be
ministered to as such.
In relation to the first issue, I
can see the concern. In Comfort’s book, he goes to great lengths to explain the
significance of the Ten Commandments themselves overlooking the fact that they
were originally given to the Israelite nation and not to the gentiles. However,
for those who think I am suggesting that the commandments don’t apply to us
today--ALL, except one, of the Ten Commandments is actually repeated and
confirmed in the New Testament and therefore does apply to NT believers. (The
Sabbath Day command is the exception and has little relevance to this
discussion about biblical evangelism.)
The question that naturally arises
is, why place so much emphasis on the Ten Commandments as given to Moses when
we can use the NT with its wider scope and more relevant application for today?
That would avoid the common argument that we are not living under the Old Covenant
and that therefore the rules don’t apply.
Critics of Comfort’s approach
argue that the use of the Ten Commandments is too narrow and excludes other
effective methods. Also, that he is telling people that they will be judged
according to their adherence to the Ten Commandments alone. They point out that
the bigger offence is the rejection of God and of Jesus as their Saviour from
their sin. The greatest commandment given by Jesus Himself is after all, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind.” (Matthew 22 vs 37)
Honestly, this is a tough one for
me. There are people arguing that scaring or terrifying people about hell is
not effective or loving. But personally, it was sufficient to convert me and
cause me to give up my worldly life. I'm not sure whether the goodness of God alone would've had the same effect. Convincing people that hell is a real
place and that their sins will take them there forever is important. I can see
Comfort’s rationale in this respect. I can also see that he has a genuine love
for the lost and desire for them to be truly saved.
If there is a choice between the
shallow and false conversions we are seeing everywhere today and Comfort’s
approach, I would definitely side with Comfort. Actually, the videos that had
the biggest impact on me were those of the large numbers of people who claimed they were born
again/evangelical Christians cheerfully admitting lying, stealing, pre-marital
sex, pornography, drunkenness, drug taking etc. The shocking thing was that these “Christians”
felt no shame or guilt about their lifestyles and didn’t even acknowledge that
these things were wrong. The main reason given was that everyone else was doing it. They weren’t giving into temptation and repenting and
trying again. They were completely unconcerned and apathetic. They were false
converts filling the churches on Sundays.
Having said that, I don’t agree
with a standardised or method approach that must always be used in evangelism. I
have used lots of methods over the years and I think it’s important to really
hear the heart of the other person. Sin must be confronted in every Gospel
conversation and the Good News about Jesus offered. It is necessary for a
person to understand what they are being saved from and how serious their sin
is in God’s eyes. I like the way Comfort talks about a change of perspective reminding us that it is our own sin that takes us to hell. He speaks about how ridiculous it is for millions of tiny people (in comparison to God) walking around on the earth shaking their fists at their Creator as if that will change reality.
I would highly recommend the
resources on Comfort’s website, Way of the Master, as I believe they
will make people think. I admire him for tackling controversial issues that
others have avoided. There is no doubt that his work has done a lot of
good in the American church. But personally, I would use New Testament texts
where possible in evangelism and ensure that the biggest sin of all—rejection of
God—is highlighted in any presentation.