There is no doubt that Christian standards of holiness are lowering across the globe. We shouldn’t be surprised by this as the Bible tells us that there will be a progressive decline into worldliness. As individuals we can probably see that our “willingness to compromise” in some areas has grown stronger as we succumb to cultural influences and pressures over time. We eventually give in because we are fed up with standing alone on a particular issue or because we forget why we took a stand on that issue in the first place or because we wonder whether taking a stand is really that important. We become distracted and, like the Church at Ephesus, forget our “first love.”
But what will happen if Christians continue to “blend in” with those around them? When there is no visible difference between us and our non-believing neighbours, friends and colleagues, what happens to our message of HOPE in Jesus? It is nullified and becomes void and irrelevant. Unless our lives are visibly different, people will simply not be interested in hearing our message. How can we proclaim the life transforming power of God if our lives have not been transformed and if we are the same as our worldly counterparts?
I’m not speaking here of pretending to be people that we are not; pretending everything is fine when we are facing trials and struggles to create the illusion of happiness so that people won’t lose confidence in God. This is spiritual pride and a reason for a lot of loneliness in some churches where people feel they have to pretend they are okay as everyone else seems to be okay. So we all walk around telling each other we are okay when actually we are not. That is not biblical Christianity. Being real and honest about our problems and showing vulnerability at difficult times shows humanity that makes our message more authentic to non-believers. It also helps them to trust and confide in us as they realise, we can empathise with them when they are struggling. The point is that even in the midst of our trials we should be seeking to trust God as we know that He is faithful and will not leave or forsake us even when we fall into sin or other difficulties. Our hope is always in Him even when we face hardship or have a tough time understanding our circumstances. We believe that God is teaching us something through any and all troubles, so they are not in vain. We are looking for the spiritual life lessons that we can learn.
Every day as Christians we make decisions that impact those around us, those who are still walking in darkness, whose spiritual eyes have not yet been opened to the truth of the Gospel. The reality is that these people are on a broad road to an eternity in Hell. Do we really believe this? Do we have any care or concern for those people? Do we constantly remind ourselves “there but for the grace of God go I?” or do we sit in judgement over them and leave that conversation for another day?
Why are we allowing ourselves to compromise in areas that in the past would have been unthinkable? There is a danger that in trying to be more “relevant” and “progressive” we are wandering into sin and taking others with us. Have God’s standards of holiness changed? The obvious answer is “no” because God Himself does not change. Non-believers are closely watching us and our lifestyles to see whether our message is genuine. Subconsciously they are looking for an excuse to reject God and Christians who are not seeking to live holy lives can easily be used as that excuse. You may not even be aware that your conduct has resulted in a life-changing decision for another person, but God is aware as He cares for every soul. We are His representatives here on earth.
In a recent discussion a fellow believer commented that it would be good if we could have a “24-hour break” from being Christians. This person was struggling with the constant pressures of the Christian life; attempting to be different and to not conform to worldly standards. His comment will resonate with true believers as if we are striving for holiness in our Christian walk our lives will always be hard. The Christian life is a constant battle and “we are not wrestling against flesh and blood.” (Ephesians 6.) But the reality is that there is no break, certainly there are times of rest and reflection, but even during those we are still Christians and should still be seeking to trust and follow God.
Sometimes it seems that new believers have an advantage here as they see things with greater clarity than those who have become weary of the battle. Some relatively new Christians said to me recently that they didn’t understand why Christians were arguing about a certain topic in the Bible as God’s instructions on this topic were clear. Their faith has not yet been corrupted by worldliness so in their minds there was no debate, they accepted the Bible as the inspired and 100% accurate Word of God. How different would our churches be if we all did that? If we stopped listening to the enemy asking us “Did God really say?” to justify our sin and returned to a simple belief in God’s Word.
Maybe as Christians we should examine our current standards and see whether we have lapsed into worldliness or conformed to our various cultural standards over time. What we eat, drink, listen to, watch, say, wear, read, write, think, and how and where we spend our time and who with, is important to God and does impact those around us often unintentionally. Sometimes not doing or saying something when we should is just as damaging and stops others being bold and speaking out.
We should then ask the question whether the changes in our behaviour/lifestyles are acceptable in light of God’s Word or whether we need to re-evaluate our standards. This may involve swimming against the tide and standing alone for a time, but this is what God calls us to do. Think of Paul, Daniel, Joseph and Job and the many other Scriptural examples of those who took a stand, or the more modern examples of the McArthur family in the Asher’s Bakery case and those individuals who have stood against Sunday trading. If more of us supported these individuals instead of hiding away or distancing ourselves then none of us would be forced to take the stand alone.
I will end with a word of caution as per my post title. Sadly, it is often opposition from within our own ranks that does the most damage to a Christian seeking to live for God. How careful we must be before labelling a fellow believer as a “legalist.” Surely, we should seek to encourage that believer and should not be doing something that might harm their conscience (Romans 14 vs 13-23.) In any case we should first make sure that whatever it is they are doing that has so offended us is not just our own sinful conscience seeking an excuse for our own sinful behaviour.
Let us pray that God will help us to humbly examine our behaviour in light of Scripture and seek ever increasing standards of holiness for His glory.
Saturday, 5 March 2016
Wednesday, 16 December 2015
All I Want For Christmas Is...
Then there are those who congratulate themselves by finishing the sentence with non-material things believing they are somehow better people for escaping the trappings of materialism; good health, success in business, and of course the ever elusive happiness.
There are even those (usually with some form of faith or moral conscience) who would answer with the less selfish desire for the health, wealth, success or happiness of someone else that is important to them.
But how many of us would answer that our only true desire this Christmas is for the salvation of a sister, brother, mother, father, grandmother, grandfather, aunt, uncle, colleague, neighbour, friend or stranger that we pass every day on the street? And if we were to answer that this was our only true desire, how many of us would be answering honestly? To take it one step further, how many of us have been actively preparing for the opportunity since September when the Christmas shopping usually begins? How many of us have been sincerely praying and seeking God for an individual that is important to us in some way or another? How many couldn’t wait for Christmas to come in order to take the opportunity to send that person an evangelistic card or book, to invite that person to Church or to Christmas lunch or even just to have that conversation about the meaning of Christmas for a Christian? How many of us are excited about this opportunity even if we know it will be inconvenient in some way for us?
Mostly at Christmas, as Christians, we behave in the same way as non-believers with ever increasing budgets and excessive celebrations. We forget what we are doing and miss the opportunities for evangelism. We don’t take our calling seriously. We feel good if we go to Church, avoid drinking too much or spending too much and we believe that somehow this is a witness to non-believers. Maybe they will respect us more or think that we are morally more upright than they are for our stance but what does that really achieve if we don’t communicate the reason for our different behaviour. If we don’t tell them that Jesus is the only true hope this Christmas and if we don’t remind them who and what we are celebrating.
Bizarrely at Christmas we tend to focus on ourselves and our families (personal or Church) and forget those outside our circles who are likely more unhappy at Christmas time, and just after, than at any other time of the year. There is much disappointment, sadness, loneliness and tragically suicide at Christmas and yet as Christians we remain silent or take a “well deserved” break and withdraw from the hopeless and helpless souls that need us most.
We have the only message of HOPE for those still living in darkness but
“How then will they call on Him in whom they have not believed? How will they believe in Him whom they have not heard? And how will they hear without a preacher?” Romans 10 vs 14
With just ONE WEEK to go there is still time to reach out to that person(s) that God has laid on your heart OR you can let another year slip by and hope that God is patient with you and with the person whose heart He has already prepared.
Let’s be bold and reach out to those with whom we have contact as it may be our last opportunity to do so.
Have a blessed and fruitful Christmas and a peaceful New Year.
Labels:
#Christian,
#Christmas,
#materialism,
help,
hope,
Jesus
Sunday, 2 August 2015
The Fog
The enemy often seems to work like this but the fog appears so gradually that we don’t notice it at first. Things do get harder but we attribute it to the trials of life and concentrate on navigating through the fog rather than trying to find the escape route. We pray that God will help us to endure rather than considering that God may not want us to remain in the circumstances. We think the “spiritual” thing to do is to persevere. We don’t consider what will happen if the fog begins to overwhelm us and we start to lose track of ourselves in the midst of it. When this happens we foolishly believe that we have come so far already and persevered for so long that any attempt to exit now would make the journey so far a waste. We forget that we are learning all of the time and that God has a purpose in everything we experience, even seemingly meaningless times of floundering in fog.
When emerging from the fog we have two choices. We can either waste more time regretting the experience/wishing we had done things differently or exited before or we can PRESS ON, re-join the Christian race and continue pursuing the things we had on our hearts before we encountered the fog. Re-joining the race will often mean leaving others behind and it can be a lonely path. But it is the ONLY option for the Christian who has his heart set on the ultimate goal; eternity with Christ in heaven.
Consider the words of Spurgeon as an encouragement to leave the fog behind and to reach out to those who are not just temporarily incapacitated (by fog) but who are permanently blind and living in darkness without hope in this life
“Even if I were utterly selfish, and had no care for anything but my own happiness, I would choose, if I might, under God, to be a soul winner, for never did I know perfect, overflowing, unutterable happiness of the purest and most ennobling order, till I first heard of one who had sought and found a Saviour through my means.”
Thursday, 25 June 2015
Why it's Not Okay for a Christian Author to Swear
I recently
started a Goodreads group for Christian books only. I had the idea after I
joined another Goodreads group that required me to review books in order to generate reviews for my own book. Although
the category I joined was labelled “clean”, I found that I was uninspired by the
books I was assigned to read and, as a Christian, also felt uncomfortable with
some of the content. I was also concerned that my own book was being reviewed
by non-believers who would be unlikely to respond positively to the Christian
content, (although in some cases they did.)
Having been
running for a few months, our group now has nearly one hundred members. There has been
some lively discussion in the group surrounding certain topics. One of these is
worthy of further consideration, the issue of Christian authors using profanity
in Christian books. Those that have been reading my blog for a while, or that
know me, will guess that I have strong views on this subject. I tend to be more
flexible as the moderator of the group as I know not everyone shares my
opinion.
For myself,
in the past I developed a “three strikes and you’re out rule” in relation to secular
books, music, and movies, and would switch off the TV show or dispose of the book
on the third swear word. I found myself becoming more tolerant to certain less
offensive words and not “counting” them. This was necessary, or I would never
have been able to watch or read anything! My rule also meant that I couldn’t
watch anything above a 12 certificate in the UK as standards were lowered
across the board. More violence, sex, swearing, drug taking…you name it.
But that’s
the secular world and is to be expected, to a certain extent. Christians can’t
hold the world to their standards of holiness as the world makes no claim
to be holy. Christians can and should, however, hold themselves to different
standards, standards set by God in His Word.
“I tell you, on the day of judgment people will
give account for every careless word they speak, for by your words you will be
justified, and by your words you will be condemned.” Matthew 12 vs 36-37
I first
discovered profanity in a “Christian” book; The Shack, about ten years ago. I
threw the book away after a few chapters due to the other content but mainly
stopped reading due to the swearing. At the time, I couldn’t believe the book
went on to be a best-seller and that little comment was made about the language
used by the author.
Since then
I have discovered profanity, and more worryingly blasphemy, in many “Christian”
books and also on Christian blogs, including one very popular female missionary
blogger who seems to want to make a name for herself by shocking people with
her bad language and making herself as un-stereotypically “missionary” as
possible. On reading the comments on her
various blog posts, I was disappointed to see that not a single person commented
on her language. Instead they heaped praise on her and her blog has reached the
“most read” lists. I was disappointed, but not surprised.
I think we
need to ask why Christians feel the need to express themselves in this way
especially when not relaying actual events. In a book of fiction, why would a
Christian author choose to use words that may offend their readers, or more
importantly might offend God. Do authors really believe that readers will buy
books because they contain profanity? Or that they will lose sales if they don’t
include it? Or that using profanity creates a more realistic and lifelike scene
and builds characters? To those that think this is legalism, I would ask whether
you would use that language in a conversation with God in prayer. If there is a
word that you are not sure about, why risk using it and potentially causing a
brother, or sister, to stumble. Find another word, there are plenty of them.
In a non-fiction book it is more understandable, but still not acceptable. In my own books, when someone swore in reality, I either chose not to include it, or where necessary, wrote, “insert two four
letter words,” rather than shocking the audience with the words that were
actually used which definitely shouldn’t be repeated by a Christian author.
It beggars
belief, that some Christian authors are even using blasphemy (using God or Jesus’
name as a swear word,) and sometimes frequently throughout their books. This is
a direct violation of a biblical commandment and it’s now in print, copyrighted
and for all the world to see.
“You shall not take the name of the Lord your
God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in
vain.” Exodus 20 vs 7
What kind
of message does this give; that Christians don’t value their faith, their
God, their standards of holiness? At times, Christians are even shocking
non-believers with their language/ blasphemy; the world expects Christians
to adhere to the values they claim to represent. When Christians don’t adhere
to these values it gives non-believers a reason to doubt the sincerity of the
Christian, and their message. In their minds (and with the enemy’s input,) they
may even use this hypocrisy as a reason to dismiss Christianity altogether.
When
Christian authors use profanity, especially blasphemy, they are undermining the
message in their books and seeking to identify themselves with, and blend in
with, the world. This is the complete opposite of what God tells us to do in His
Word.
“Therefore, come out from among unbelievers,
and separate yourselves from them, says the LORD. Don't touch their filthy
things, and I will welcome you.” – 2 Corinthians 6 vs 17
We should
not be seeking to shock people, or to entertain them by using curse words or by
walking danger lines to get attention for ourselves, our blogs or our books. Instead
we should seek to inspire each other, as Christian authors, to greater
standards of holiness so that our message of HOPE in Jesus remains authentic.
“Let
there be no filthiness nor foolish talk nor crude joking, which are out of
place, but instead let there be thanksgiving.” (Ephesians 5:4)
“But now you must put them all away: anger,
wrath, malice, slander, and obscene talk from your mouth.” (Colossians 3:8)
“From the same mouth come blessing and cursing.
My brothers, these things ought not to be so.” (James 3:10)
Labels:
#christianbooks,
#Jesussaves,
christian author,
cursing,
holiness,
profanity,
swearing,
worldly standards
Friday, 19 June 2015
Help Without Hope; The Ultimate Tragedy
A few months ago, I purchased a book cheaply in a second-hand bookshop, Vietnam Doctor; The Story of Project Concern, by Dr James Turpin, published in the 1960’s. It had a Baptist church library (USA) stamp in it, I believed it was a Christian book about a Christian medical doctor operating in Vietnam. Every so often I read a book that profoundly impacts me; this was one of those books, but for all the wrong reasons. I decided to write about this for Christian readers in an attempt to pass on what I have learned in reading this book. Also, to encourage Christians (myself included) to be wise in our missionary giving.
I realise that what follows will not be a popular view. I should start by saying that the book was extremely engaging, and I read it through in a few hours. I was also prompted to research the organisation, Project Concern, which is still currently active in some of the original areas, especially in Vietnam. I have no doubt about the sincerity of these people or of the good work they are doing from a humanitarian perspective.
Summary of Book Content
Dr James Turpin states that he was “converted” to Christianity at the age of 12 during a service in his local Methodist church. He describes his “fling” at preaching when he was just 14. Having failed to graduate from medical school, he became a Methodist preacher but constantly struggled with discontentedness and the desire to work in the medical field, perhaps as a missionary. He married Mollie, who had also had a conversion experience in her teens. As a married couple, it seems they struggled to find their “place” in life, and in faith. They began making plans to become missionaries more out of a sense of obligation than calling. Unable to fulfill his duties as a preacher, Dr Turpin returned to medical school and finally graduated. The family then lived a life of material luxury for several years, but Dr Turpin couldn’t shake off his restlessness. Finally, he began work in a slum area not far from their home in the States. He developed a heart for this work and the missionary “calling” which hadn’t been properly resolved reared its head again.
The couple (now with several children) applied to World Vision but were unable in good conscience to sign a statement stating that the Bible was 100% accurate/inspired by God. Not finding an organisation that suited them they founded PCI (Project Concern International.) PCI is a non-profit, humanitarian NGO based in San Diego, California, and is dedicated to preventing disease, improving community health, and promoting sustainable development. PCI reaches nearly 6 million people a year through programs in Asia, Africa, and the Americas (Wikipedia)
Dr Turpin and his wife started medical clinics in Hong Kong and later in Vietnam and other places, living amongst the people in the slums and working in the neediest areas. They worked with locals, handing over the work to them when they had been properly trained. They learned how to work with “sorcerers” to gain the trust of the people and allowed locals to give them “good luck charms” in the form of mirrors that they displayed in their residence.
After the initial struggles to find his place in life and his “dabbling” in Christian work, Dr Turpin makes no further mention of God or of his teenage conversion although he continues to attend church, preaching on occasion. Instead, he throws himself wholeheartedly into medical work making huge personal sacrifices and forcing his family to endure these with him. Although seemingly selfless in his efforts to help others, he acknowledges at times that his ultimate goal is his own personal contentment/fulfillment. He states several times that he believes that medical help can transform lives and communities and he even believed it could end the war in Vietnam!
Help Without Hope
Maybe some of you are reading this and thinking that it sounds like a good cause and wondering what my problem is. Clearly, this couple had a huge heart of compassion and love for the people, this is evident in the book as they struggle to manage the constant demands of those in poverty. Many of those they “helped” died after a few weeks, days, or sometimes just hours, but the staff comforted themselves in the knowledge that they had made the last hours of many lives less painful and more positive. I particularly remember one old man who came to them lonely and emaciated and asked to stay with them as he was neglected by his own family, he died after several weeks, but at least they had seen him smile and he was now at peace...right?
This book was written in the 1960’s and life expectancy in these areas was a little over 40 years. The majority, if not all of the people “helped” by these kind-hearted people have now died and where have they gone? Most likely, to a lost eternity without God (unless they miraculously heard the saving message of Jesus via another source.) What benefit now of the treatment that sustained their life for a few days or hours? What of those that continue to be helped practically but who remain in their sin without spiritual hope. How can a former preacher who apparently still has an “active faith” devote his entire life to serving the physical needs of people but miss these kinds of opportunities to make a real difference spiritually?
Dr Turpin proudly states, “We call ourselves medical emissaries because we're not theological; we're not trying to convert people to a religion or a way of life other than healthy," He even mentions that several partners were pleased that they had no religious affiliations, and the implication is that they wouldn’t have been willing to partner with them otherwise.
Where is Dr Turpin now?
Sadly, Dr Turpin was later divorced from his wife Mollie, he remarried and finally converted to the Bahá'à Faith. (The Bahá'à Faith is a monotheistic religion which emphasizes the spiritual unity of all humankind. Three core principles establish a basis for Bahá'à teachings and doctrine: the unity of God, that there is only one God who is the source of all creation; the unity of religion, that all major religions have the same spiritual source and come from the same God; and the unity of humanity, that all humans have been created equal, and the unity in diversity, that diversity of race and culture are seen as worthy of appreciation and acceptance. According to the Bahá'à Faith's teachings, the human purpose is to learn to know and to love God through such methods as prayer, reflection and being of service to humanity.) (Wikipedia)
He began a lawsuit in the US after 2 of his children were born blind. The case was called “wrongful life.” Dr Turpin successfully argued that life should’ve been prevented as due to the genetic makeup of the parents the disability could have been predicted...
What Can We Learn
There is a lesson here for all of us as Christians. There are numerous organisations operating throughout the world with a similar set-up to Project Concern. They are staffed by well intentioned, self-sacrificial people with compassionate hearts. Many of these people are Christians. When we learn of the huge needs and humanitarian crises, of course our hearts go out to those involved and those in desperate need. We give generously to help practically but what of the spiritual need. A healthy person with food and clothes will one day die and go to hell if they are not told of the hope they can find in Jesus, prolonging their life is not kind, it is cruel if we don’t also tell them of the ultimate cure, and of hope for eternal life in heaven.
This book had such a profound impact on me as I felt the hopelessness and meaningless of all of this activity without God. The loss of every precious soul that died in that medical clinic without knowing true hope when just a few words in the Holy Spirit’s power would have been sufficient. The frustration of knowing that this couple had professed Christ as teenagers and that Dr Turpin had once been a preacher and claims still to have an active faith. The many local volunteers and those from other countries that also worked with and continue to staff Project Concern without knowing true hope themselves and therefore being unable to offer it to their many patients.
One paragraph towards the end of the book sums up the situation. K’Moung (one of the regular staff) is speaking to Dr Turpin and others.
“I have suspected that there is something inside me that is special….And it would come to me that my mind, my heart, my life could mean something.” This started a discussion amongst the students, Koho and Vietnamese, about a life and what it meant. Each had an opinion to express, a story to tell, an incident to recall. These people swapped their ideas in soft voices and stopped only when the moon was high in the sky.” (Dr Turpin then narrates) I didn’t say another word, for I had nothing constructive to add…..”
What a tragic waste…
As Christians we have a responsibility to steward our finances effectively and support only those organisations and people that share the Gospel as they help people. The Gospel must be the priority and practical help should also be offered where it is possible. The popular quotes “You can show God’s love with a smile” and “Preach the Gospel, and if necessary, use words” are both fundamentally wrong. How can people know it is God’s love we are demonstrating by our smiles unless we tell them? And the second quote has been effectively changed to read “Preach the Gospel, always use words!” as this is the method that God has chosen by which people will be saved.
“Only one life twill soon be past, only what’s DONE FOR CHRIST will last.” – CT Studd
Wednesday, 10 June 2015
The Difference Between a Christian and an Unexploded Bomb in the UK
However, the precedent that this case sets will not be sufficient to change mind sets and stereotypes about Christians and what they do and don’t believe, which sadly are becoming entrenched. As a supposedly democratic society, we are not only being forced to behaviourally adhere to a specific set of politically correct beliefs and values, we are now being told what to say, how to say it, when to speak and when not to speak. If this continues, there will come a time when every person will be forced to think appropriate thoughts in an appropriate manner about appropriate things, and no doubt these thoughts will be pre-determined by a state sanctioned body set up to police them. Nigel Farage, although not speaking from a religious perspective, summed the situation up nicely when he was asked how people would respond to his view on a certain issue by stating that it didn’t really matter because “everyone wants to be bland, wishy-washy and like each other.” But is that really what we want and the direction we want to take? To live in a country where no one has opinions and instead subscribes to the only “correct viewpoint.” Do we want to become like lemmings or zombies with nothing in our minds?
The reaction to the Mbuyi case will be interesting, as watching Mbuyi being interviewed, it is already clear that some think that the judgement is wrong and might be overturned on appeal. But where would that leave us? Should a Christian who finds themselves in the position of being asked a question about their beliefs on homosexuality be forced to lie or change the subject or leave the room or simply state that they are not allowed to express their view. The question should really be asked why the other party in this case pursued this line of questioning in the first place as it seems that she was likely aware of the beliefs of Mbuyi but wanted them verbalised. The action taken by the nursery in sacking Mbuyi just two days after the conversation demonstrates a total lack of consideration for her as an employee, and as a Christian. There was no time for any discussion or clarification of the facts. The message: your Christian views are not acceptable to us, you’re fired!
There is a very real climate of fear (especially in the workplace) surrounding having and expressing Christian views on a whole range of subjects including but not limited to, homosexuality and gay marriage, abortion, euthanasia, family life and state interference. I find myself wondering, in many of these cases that have reached the stage of tribunals and courts, why the parties involved didn’t just sit down and have a conversation about what had happened. Surely if both parties listened to each other’s viewpoints, they could understand each other’s views, where they came from and in most cases agree to disagree.
In my own case, whilst employed as a police officer but off duty and in my free time, I attended a peaceful protest at a Gay Pride parade near my hometown. During the disciplinary aftermath, it was evident that this culture of fear permeated every level. Colleagues were afraid to talk to me in case they somehow were tarred with the same brush. Senior managers rushed around consulting every rulebook and numerous other agencies for “advice” on how to deal with the situation. They held meetings where I was treated like a bomb about to explode; in one such meeting, after I had prepared myself to explain my Christian viewpoint, the senior manager walked in, sat down, read two pages of advice, got up and left the room before I even had the chance to open my mouth. I was left with a feeling of rejection, hurt and ultimately as if I was a “bad person” for holding my Christian view. This after many years of faithful police service.
My attempts for a follow up meeting were met with stony walls of silence and when I persisted, I received a formal letter advising that the matter was considered “finalised” and that there would be no more discussion about it and that we should all "return to policing as usual." Eventually I was able to meet with an even more senior figure who advised me that some people would consider my views “abhorrent” but that I had the right to hold them. This person sensibly commented that every person likely held certain views that in some respect would be incompatible with the values of the police service, but it was how they behaved towards others that was important. He conceded that I couldn’t be held to account for the “potential to discriminate” because of what I believed. I pointed out that my views were clearly written in the Bible, the very same book that most police officers still use when giving the oath before they give evidence in court…
My point is that Christians (and indeed all people) should be able to freely express their views on any subject during any conversation especially when asked for their opinion. They shouldn’t have to be worrying about how to respond or hiding what they truly believe. We should be mature enough to agree to disagree on certain issues, not respond by taking each other to court. What does a court case really achieve anyway, it doesn’t force a person to change their view or prove that a certain view is the correct one.
As a Christian I should make the point that God’s view found in His Word, the Bible, is always the correct one. I hope I can say this without the fear of alienation, widespread condemnation or of prosecution. This verse for Christians facing these issues at work and in other places.
“In God I trust, and I am not afraid. What can man do to me?” Psalm 56 vs 11
Thursday, 4 June 2015
Why Most People Fail to Learn Tagalog! #languagelearning #tagalog

I thought
it was time for a language related blog post. Oh good…you are thinking :) I’m hoping somehow that some of the
burden of learning the Tagalog language will be supernaturally transferred to
you through my blog thus reducing the headache I still have after every one of
my classes. Or maybe not, let’s see.
Languages
were never really my strong point, probably because I spent most of my time
speaking German in my French class and vice versa for the entertainment of
other students. I managed an unexpected B in German purely because the question
in my final exam was “What do you do on a typical day?” and as it happened,
that was the only thing I had learnt over the course of 5 years.
When I knew
God was calling me to the Philippines, I began learning Tagalog words and odd
phrases straight away. This was when I was still on the Logos Hope Christian Missionary Ship towards the
end of 2012. My Filipino friend Arlene helped me, and I used a borrowed phrase
book. I learned the essentials needed to tell the street children to do things
or more often NOT to do things. My first phrase was “sandali lang” which means “wait
a moment,” but I was even pronouncing that wrong. However, as I was quickly
learning a lot of words, I naively thought the rest would be easy. It doesn’t
help that saying even the most basic word to a Filipino in Tagalog always
results in a ridiculously over the top amount of praise and comments like “You
know Tagalog, you are very good.”
Early
mistakes included confusing the words “pusa” (cat) and “puso” (heart) thereby
telling an audience that Jesus was living in my cat….hmmm. I was also ridiculed
by one of my street kids when I told him that he was “jealous” (inggit ka)
instead of to “take care” (ingat ka.) But by far the biggest problem I had was
that Filipinos expected me to speak English, so wouldn’t be listening for
Tagalog, and therefore wouldn’t understand it due to my accent. And that they would
often reply in English, because they want to learn English, or want to impress
me because I’m a foreigner. (Foreigners in the Philippines are treated like
royalty at times and it’s impossible to change this, i’m learning to try and be
gracious.)
My wake-up
call came as soon as I started learning Tagalog grammar (that was when the
headaches started.) It was also when I somehow told one of my language teachers
that I had stopped attending a church because the people there were too small.
Being a foreigner and tall in comparison with most Filipinos this was of
course hilarious. I had just said the words in the wrong order, and this was the
result. Other mistakes: “My coffee likes to drink me” and I told a group of
children that I liked the cockroach eating my face instead of that the
cockroach liked to bite my face, after waking up with a huge lump that locals
immediately attributed to a cockroach. Yuck!…There are many many others.
Explaining
just one English verb in Tagalog to my parents the other day via Skype had them
scratching their heads and searching desperately for a reason to end the call.
Let’s see if you can cope :)
The root word “Give” – Simple in English; Gave/Given (past) Giving
(present) Will give (future)
BUT in
Tagalog…there are 12 words and each time
you use a different one of the words you
also have to change all of the other words in the sentence. The reason is because Tagalog
doesn’t just have past, present and future tenses but also a focus/emphasis
within the sentence. You change the word used to change the emphasis in the
sentence. In English we would just use our tone of voice to do this (you also need to do this in Tagalog, in addition to everything else, by
changing your voice pitch for different syllables, to separate two
identical words and to make the words sound correct) You can use agent,
object or location focus/emphasis for nearly every verb. Like this with the word “give”.
The root word “Bigay”
Agent
focus; Magbigay (timeless) Nagbigay (past) Nagbibigay (present) Magbibigay(future)
Object focus; Ibigay (timeless) Ibinigay (past) Ibinibigay (present) Ibibigay
(future)
Location focus;
Bigyan (timeless) Binigyan (past) Binibigyan (present) Bibigyan (future)
Want to
learn anymore? Didn’t think so!
The vast numbers
of variations continue in every aspect of the language e.g., there are 8 different
ways to say a person is very tall rather than the 3 in English. Of course, I have
to learn all of them so that I can understand if any of them are used (at least
that’s my teacher’s logic.) There is also an extra letter in the alphabet “ng”
which is very hard for a Westerner to pronounce, and they only half pronounce
their “t’s” I learnt this when singing in church, it’s amazing how loud that “t”
is when no one else is singing it. My teacher tells me to “swallow my t’s” but I
haven’t quite figured out how to do this.
The funny
thing (or annoying depending on your perspective) is that the Filipinos think
that English doesn’t make any sense because of words like “cough” and “cow” and
the other anomalies of the language. But from my perspective, the only easy
thing about Tagalog is that most of the time the words are spelt as they sound.
And I cannot for the life of me work out WHY there needs to be a particular
focus in a sentence which definitely quadruples the number of words required
and confusion rendered to a Westerner. “Aaah” the locals say, “Tagalog is clever
because as soon as you hear the verb you know what the focus of the sentence
is.” (They start the sentence with the verb as well which is also the opposite
to English). Honestly, knowing the focus of the sentence is the least of my
worries when I’m trying to work out the meaning of all of the other words,
which order they go in, which time tense to use and where to use the
tones/gluttal stop etc etc etc……
Please
forgive me for offloading this onto you…typing this has made me feel better. I’m
sure anyone learning a new language has the same difficulties. Any Filipino
readers, no offence intended. I love your country…honestly!
Labels:
Christian Mission,
culture shock,
language challenges,
language problems,
Philippines,
tagalog
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





